guided tour – artist in residence

presentation in Q21 residency, arranged living/working studio for MQ guided tour, April 2017.

8 minutes reading presentation with photo projection:

“8 minutes of speech is 1040 words, according to the online convertor. I read this text last night with a stopwatch and it seams that I am talking faster than what is considered to be average speed of the reading – I did 1120 words in 8 minutes. I have just used 52 words and almost half of a minute to illustrate in which way is a particular context of a presentation relevant for my artistic activity.
And for the rest 7 minutes, I can only promise the experience impossible to reproduce again in any other moment in time.

These are the photos taken on the location of the potential crime scene for the investigation case. The mystery already started and the story is now situated in certain space, which is my room in the residency.

An incident for rising action of the story:
Shortly after my arrival at the residency, I discovered the text written on a mirror. It was a call for help of an artist left powerless when facing today’s art system:

I hear them talk about the death of art, the death of art is the death of the artist, someone wants to kill me, help

Description of the characters:
Mostly occupied researching the examples of different artistic practices that are found in the periphery of art history that are usually dismissed on its importance for their legendary and anecdotal character, I, Adrijana, will be in the following story an eccentric, amateur detective. In mystery crime stories, this detective generally has nothing material to gain from solving the crime.
This fits so well with the role of artists, as seen from the perspective of society.
Therefore when Adrijana saw this message, she was guided only by a personal motivation and a desire to help.

The artist was asking for help. She had to find who would have motivation and profit of the death of art, who are them who talk about it and this will take me closer to find out who is this artist and what was she or he doing that put her or him in danger?
She thought it is kinda strange. Who announces the death of the art if not the artist herself or himself? Who are these others? The institution, curators, critics, academics, collectors, dealers, the public. People with jobs in art?

Also, I have to say, she had moments of doubting to take part, reading this message as one of varied strategies of myth making common to the art field, that has as its sole intention the speculation of value.

Looking more carefully around the room, she has found herself surrounded with evidences.


The Milky way chocolate bar comes from the box of them exhibited on a pedestal, which is marked with the label NO. Only one person is invited to enter the room and interacts with the artwork. Tricky! Alone in a room, with no one watching, the artist made choices to intrude and disrupt the space. This led her to the conclusion that maybe the artist doesn’t follow the protocols and she was curious to find why.
Also it is interesting that chocolate is chocolate and a sculpture of a chocolate is a sculpture but it’s not a chocolate.

Same goes for those bubble gums that are not chewed. This chewing gum is taken from one of 10 vending machines designed to measure happiness. Marked with 1 for miserable until 10 for ecstatic. What if the artist was miserable and ecstatic?

If she would know the level of happiness, could that help her to measure a success of the artist? And if artist is not professionally successful does it mean that she or he doesn’t love to do art? Or she or he just didn’t have luck.

In some languages, like in Adrijana’s language or German being happy and being lucky are expressed in one word. In English synonyms for happy as an adjective, characterised by good fortune are: lucky, fortunate and providential.
Adrijana’s artistic way of thinking, which is in this story also a detective ability, led her to conclusion that the death of the art is connected with the belief in luck. Luck is a quality shared by random, unintended or unpredictable events or a luck is the cause of events of chance and hazard. Luckiness is also a success attained as a result of chance.
If there is a belief in good or bad luck, there is a belief in irrational influences on it, and there is a practice based on such a belief – a superstition!

She couldn’t find out how happy artist was, but she found Hater Blocker Contact Lenses on the sink, that have protective charms. They resemble nazars (from the Arabic word for sight or seeing) and are used against the ‘evil eye’. And evil is in the eyes of The Other.

Now we are sure that the artist was training her or his mind for happiness or luck and trying to protect herself or himself from the evil.

Chapter II POWER

In stories, there are three believable motives to commit a crime of killing another person: greed, survival and revenge.

In art world these three translates into: creating value, branding and institutionalising. 

There are some evidences found, that imitate money and as artworks they speculate about the value. Art is a visual allegory, a metaphor, a ‘vision.’ It is a proposition, not an expression of truth. As a money is a metaphor for value.

Blue as the sky, blue horizon, blue as the see, blue screen, blue light, blue bird, blue sand, blue as a stuck of sheets of a blue paper.

You can take one of those from the exhibition and become a collector.

As clouds in trousers, artists are trying to regulate boundless artistic freedom, give structure to work, set of rules, listings, manifestos. Is it a seduction, just a feeling of being in control? Or a key for success? Or just a consequence of precarious existence, lacking in predictability, job security, material or psychological welfare. Did artists first branded themselves then became precariat or precarity was branded?

Or it’s all only for fun? Party people!

The artist busted her or his energy with – no bull premium taurine – an evidence for the strategy of reappropriation, cannibalisation of a dominant structure by eating it, digesting it and excreting it in an entirely new form.

In art there has to be seriousness and wit, aesthetic and political engagement, inventive resistance to architecture as monumentality and other symbols of the State. All this is part of artist’s uncompromising commitment.




Artist has been all the time within ourselves alone.”